v_1

v_1

{148445.0}ornmat + {148445.0}cp = {148445.0}pi + {148445.0}citmat

v_10

v_10

{40395.6}asR = {40395.6}fum + {40395.6}argR

v_11

v_11

{40395.6}arg = {40395.6}ure + {40395.6}orn

v_12

v_12

{40395.6}argR = {40395.6}ureR + {40395.6}orn

v_13

v_13

{40395.6}argQ = {40395.6}ure + {40395.6}orn

v_14

v_14

{509.861}argE = {509.861}ureE + {509.861}ornE

v_15

v_15

{509.861}argRE = {509.861}ureRE + {509.861}ornE

v_16

v_16

{509.861}argQE = {509.861}ureE + {509.861}ornE

v_17

{40395.6}orn = {244266.0}ornims

v_18

{244266.0}ornims = {148445.0}ornmat

v_19

{509.861}cppool = {509.861}cpeE

v_2

v_2

{148445.0}ornmat + {148445.0}cpR = {148445.0}pi + {148445.0}citmatR

v_20

{40395.6}cpe = {244266.0}cpims

v_21

{244266.0}cpims = {148445.0}cp

v_22

{40395.6}cpeR = {244266.0}cpimsR

v_23

{244266.0}cpimsR = {148445.0}cpR

v_24

{40395.6}atppool = {40395.6}atp

v_25

{40395.6}asppool = {40395.6}asp

v_26

{40395.6}ppi = XX

v_27

{40395.6}fum = XX

v_28

{148445.0}pi = XX

v_29

{40395.6}amp = XX

v_3

{148445.0}citmat = {244266.0}citims

v_30

v_30

{40395.6}ure = XX

v_31

{40395.6}ureR = XX

v_32

{40395.6}cit = {509.861}citE

v_33

{40395.6}citR = {509.861}citRE

v_34

{40395.6}atp = {509.861}atpE

v_35

{40395.6}asp = {509.861}aspE

v_36

{40395.6}amp = {509.861}ampE

v_37

{40395.6}ppi = {509.861}ppiE

v_38

{40395.6}as = {509.861}asE

v_39

{40395.6}asR = {509.861}asRE

v_4

{148445.0}citmatR = {244266.0}citimsR

v_40

{40395.6}fum = {509.861}fumE

v_41

{40395.6}argQ = {509.861}argQE

v_42

{40395.6}arg = {509.861}argE

v_43

{40395.6}argR = {509.861}argRE

v_44

{40395.6}ure = {509.861}ureE

v_45

v_45

{40395.6}ureR = {509.861}ureRE

v_46

{40395.6}orn = {509.861}ornE

v_47

{40395.6}cpe = {509.861}cpeE

v_48

{40395.6}cpeR = {509.861}cpeRE

v_5

{244266.0}citims = {40395.6}cit

v_6

{244266.0}citimsR = {40395.6}citR

v_7

v_7

{40395.6}cit + {40395.6}atp + {40395.6}asp = {40395.6}ppi + {40395.6}as + {40395.6}amp

v_8

v_8

{40395.6}citR + {40395.6}atp + {40395.6}asp = {40395.6}ppi + {40395.6}asR + {40395.6}amp

v_9

v_9

{40395.6}as = {40395.6}fum + {40395.6}arg

Global parameters

Note that constraints are not enforced in simulations. It remains the responsibility of the user to verify that simulation results satisfy these constraints.


Species:

Reactions:


Middle-click: pin/unpin nodes
Shift-click: pool/unpool species
Right-click: context menu

Apply alternate model layout to overlapping elements in current model:

log scales

y-axis min/max

x-axis min/max

Mathematical modelling of the urea cycle. A numerical investigation into substrate channelling.

  • Anthony D Maher
  • Philip W Kuchel
  • Fernando Ortega
  • Pedro de Atauri
  • Josep Centelles
  • Marta Cascante
Eur. J. Biochem. 2003; 270 (19): 3953-3961
Abstract
Metabolite channelling, the process in which consecutive enzymes have confined substrate transfer in metabolic pathways, has been proposed as a biochemical mechanism that has evolved because it enhances catalytic rates and protects unstable intermediates. Results from experiments on the synthesis of radioactive urea [Cheung, C., Cohen, N.S. & Raijman, L (1989) J. Biol. Chem.264, 4038-4044] have been interpreted as implying channelling of arginine between argininosuccinate lyase and arginase in permeabilized hepatocytes. To investigate this interpretation further, a mathematical model of the urea cycle was written, using Mathematica it simulates time courses of the reactions. The model includes all relevant intermediates, peripheral metabolites, and subcellular compartmentalization. Analysis of the output from the simulations supports the argument for a high degree of, but not absolute, channelling and offers insights for future experiments that could shed more light on the quantitative aspects of this phenomenon in the urea cycle and other pathways.
The model reproduces Fig 2 of the paper.